I spent the course of 2 days watching Ron Gardenhire run the “Good Morning America Drill” with the Detroit Tigers. The first day was the first day that I saw the drill and was able to get some video of it. The 2nd day, since I was mostly familiar with the workings of the drill, I focused on documenting the different rounds and movements. Attached below is a video of some of the movements (not all) and my notes for how the drill is run. The drawback of the drill is that you end up having groups of players standing around for several minutes at a time. Also, the way the drill was run at this level was that the ground ball roller gets refilled by a line of 6-7 catchers who relay the ball back to the roller who is running the drill. Both of these points have definite positives for the major league level - you want to give your guys ample rest while avoiding injury. For youth & HS players, I would likely modify this drill to keep the idle players busy and have the roller refill via a bucket while having the receivers (1B) drop their baseballs into empty buckets. What I present here is the “unmodified” drill as it was run by the Tigers. Setup - Have infielders at all 4 positions (3B, SS, 2B, 1B). Have 1 coach as your “roller” Have a line of players from 1B to the roller to relay/exchange the ball from 1B back to the roller. Rounds - there are multiple rounds, here’s a breakdown - Round 1 - consists of several different types of GBs- Conventional groundballs at the player, backhands, backhand bouncers (ball played on one bounce to the backhand), Forehand plays. Throw to 1B after fielding each ball. 3-4 reps on each GB for each player. Rotate through to other positions (SS, 2B). Other position groups wait until you rotate back to them. When you get to the 1B-men, they make DP turns to the SS - roller tosses them a ball in the air, 1B-men turn inside and turn it to the SS. No return throw. Round 2 - consists of DP turns. Roller provides both convention ground balls and backhands to players. When you get to 2B, you can include forehand spins. 1B hold runner on then catch ball in the air and then turn 2. You can bounce it to the 1B-men as well. Round 3 - on the run plays. Coach presents a roller that requires an on-the-run play. 1B-men again turn 2. At some point, you should also have your 1B play deep and receive a deep ball in the air that they then turn to SS — so they turn DPs on the OF-side of the baseline as well, like they’re playing deep on a 1st and 2nd and get a GB where they are throwing on that side of the baseline. You can also include other types of GBs, such as glove side spins, for all players. This is shown in the video below.
2 Comments
Here are a few of my favorite infield drills that I regularly incorporate into my practices. Tennis Ball Drill - good competition drill. No gloves, use tennis racket and tennis balls. Hit them at players. If they bobble the ball or miss it, they're out. Catch & Tag Drill - Reverse pivot and throw to partner. Partner puts tag down and then reverse pivots to partner. Go back and forth for as many as you like. Olympic Drill - this is a fun drill to incorporate a lot of reps and work on all types of groundballs. Since you're rolling the ball, you as the coach have the ability to stay close to your players to give feedback. In September, I attended a baseball practice at a local Japanese HS in Tokyo. This was at the tail end of a baseball trip to Japan during which I saw several professional games throughout the country. Here were a few of my observations from watching the practice (I saw about an hour-hour and a half of the workout). 1. Culture of Respect In Japan, respect for all things is important, and this was noticeable during the workout. After taking infield/outfield, all players bowed to the field and to the coaches. Also, while walking into the workout, all players removed their hats and greeted me as a visitor to their practice session. Also, anytime that a player spoke to a coach, the player would always remove his hat while listening to the coach. 2. Hustle and communication Players would hustle from station to station, even during the clean-up after practice. You can see some of the hustle here in this video. Communication was also evident during a competition that occured later in the practice. The competition was setup like this - 5 players would start near home plate, closely lined up along 3B line. You’d have a player for each INF position plus a catcher. Before taking the field, each player would yell something - mostly just random “rah rah” type stuff. After all the players have said something, they would all take off for their positions. The SS and 2B would both be in the same position at 2B. The competition would start with the catcher taking the ball and throwing it to 3B, who would then throw to 2B, who then throws to 1B who then throws back to the C. The team would throw around the horn in this manner 3 times (2B and SS alternate receiving throws at 2B). The goal was to complete the throw it around (3 times) within 17 seconds). You can see a video of the compeition below. If the team failed, they would start over from the beginning, starting from where they took the field. As you can tell from the above, there was a lot of communication/talking/enthusiasm going on while the drill was happening. The middle school team also practiced at the same time as the HS team - while the HS team was using the infield, the Jr High team would use the outfield and vice-versa. 3. Japanese live batting practice. Another thing that the teams did during BP was to do a batting practice with a live pitcher and the bases loaded. The runners at 1B and 2B would always steal, working on jumps, while 3B would work on live reads of batted balls. Each batter would have live counts. Video of the BP session is below. Other videos of the practice session are below. Generally, here are some other observations from watching Japanese professional baseball -
Here are some video of various Japanese professional INF/OF routines - Here are some other scenes from Japanese baseball - While at ABCA 2017 in Anaheim, I had a few thoughts and discussions pop up about plate approach that I want to organize here.
For anyone unsure of what this topic means, what it is is what do you tell hitters to look for as they walk up to the plate? Should they always sit on fastball and adjust to offspeed? Should they look locationally, say "middle-in"? There are different views on this and some of the ones I mention above are common thoughts. Steve Springer mentions in his talks that he believes that batters should be hunting pitches based on what they see the pitcher throwing. The batter might be a fastball hitter, but if he watches the pitcher and sees that the pitcher is throwing consistent offspeed, the batter should begin to sit on the offspeed pitches that he's seeing thrown. Another approach that I discussed at length with another person was the thought that the player should understand his or her own strengths. The player should learn through practice both what TYPE of pitcher he or she is good at hitting (e.g. fastball, curveball, etc.) AND what LOCATION the hitter is best at hitting (e.g., outside, inside, middle, etc.). I definitely liked the idea of this approach about knowing as a hitter what your strengths are, particularly knowing what pitch locations you hit the best. However, I did not like being dependent on a particular TYPE of pitch in your approach. So, for me, I think I would take a hybrid approach - definitely know what type of pitch you're best at hitting, know what pitch location you're best at hitting, and also know what type of pitches the pitcher is throwing. At the HS level, my assumption is that pitchers will be throwing mostly fastballs so I think it's safe to assume that we can sit fastball the majority of the time. But, we need to make sure of this by watching the pitcher. I also assume that most HS hitters will also be best at hitting fastballs, but it's worth knowing whether hitting fastballs is your strength or not and if not, what pitch is your strength. Based on information that you learn from watching the pitcher, I would then develop your approach. If he's pitching fastballs, sit on the fastball that's in YOUR ZONE and take anything else until you get to two strikes. Once you get to two strikes, you've got to go into battle mode and make contact on strikes, no matter what the location or type of pitch. Interested in your thoughts! Tom I'm fairly certain that I read this somewhere over the past few months but a recent situation brought it back to light. The situation was losing. In this particular situation, I was working a baseball camp and towards the end of the camp, we had a running competition in which two runners would face off against one another. The runners would run a suicide-like sprint. For the uninitiated, this normally works on a basketball court in different variations but a standard one looks like so - the runners run from the baseline to the half-court line, back to the original baseline and then all the way to the opposite baseline. Whichever runner makes it to the opposite baseline last is the "loser."
So, we had a similar situation setup in our baseball camp. Two campers were facing off in the run and one runner got out to a large lead. The other runner began to realize that he was way behind and started to give up, allowing the other runner to increase his winning margin. This situation reminded me of this idea - that even though the losing runner was way behind, the sprint still represented an opportunity for him to improve. He might lose this race, but if he fails to take advantage of the opportunity to give his full effort and improve, he lessens the chance that he is going to win in the future. The applications to baseball are pretty obvious here, but I'll present this situation - your team is losing in the middle or late in the game. If the margin is large enough, this presents a pretty good opportunity for a team to give up and just try to get the game over. However, the team needs to be reminded that this is a learning opportunity and although the score might be out of hand, it's a chance for them to improve for future competitions. Who knows, with this mindset, you might even get the team to rally and come back to win the game. There's another twist on this that I came across while watching a small college fall practice this year. The college team was split up into two squads and they were completing their annual fall world series. Rather than keeping a culmulative score for the entire game, the score was based on how many innings each team won during the game. So the overall score did not matter! Team 1 could have scored 50 more runs than Team 2 overall, but if Team 2 won more innings during the game than Team 1, Team 1 would emerge victorious. I thought that this was a great idea to maintain competitiveness during games even when one team jumps out to a big lead - change the objective for sustained effort. I posed this as a comment on another page and thought I'd copy/paste it here as well.
One related point regarding teaching cuts/relays that I heard earlier this year at ABCA Nashville and liked was the concept of rules related to the lead base. We've all probably heard about lead base before, it's basically 1 base ahead of the base runner. So if there's a runner on 1B, the lead base is 3B. If there's a runner on 2B, the lead base is home plate. If there are no runners on, the lead base is 2B. The common problem teams and OFs run into is this - let's say runner on 1B, ball hit to the OF and he/she decides to go lead base (3B) when there is no chance of getting the lead runner out. Relay goes to 3B and batter-runner takes 2B. Now, instead of keeping the DP in order and the batter-runner at 1B, you've got 2 runners in scoring position @ 2B and @ 3B. Matt Bragga at Tennessee Tech covered a rule-based system for preventing this situation. The idea is this - the OF makes a decision about what base to throw to based upon where the ball takes him/her. If the base hit takes him towards the lead base, he throws to lead base. So, for example, with a runner on 1B, if the ball is hit to the CF's right side and in front of him (i.e., towards lead base), he/she should throw towards 3B. If the ball is hit and takes the CF away from lead base, he should throw into 2B to keep the batter-runner at 1B thus keeping the double-play in order. So any ball to the CF's left unless it's a rocket to him, should go into 2B. Give up 3B to the base-runner & keep the DP in order. Same rules apply to all the other outfielders in all situations. If it's your RF with a runner on 2B, if the ball takes the RF towards home plate (lead base), relay should go into home plate. If ball takes the RF to his left or right (not towards home plate), relay should go into 2B. Also, if the OF bobbles the ball at any time, even if the ball is taking him towards lead base, he should throw into 2B. A quick video of Matt's presentation is here - https://www.youtube.com/watch?... I think this also includes some video but no audio. I recently attended the ABCA Barnstormer's clinic in Los Angeles. The Barnstormer's tour was a series of full-day coaching clinics throughout the west coast hosted by various universities. The Barnstormer stop that I attended was at the University of Southern California and while I participated in several different clinics that day, the USC head coach, Dan Hubbs, and another coach from Pepperdine gave particulary impactful presentations that I'll summarize here.
Here were my key takeaways from the sessions –
Heard about this drill from Mark Gjormand from Madison HS (VA) at the National High School Baseball Coaches Association convention in Columbus, OH in 2016. I thought it was an interesting, competitive drill that's similar to the "taters" drill that I've outlined here. Thought that I'd share the drill here for your reference and my own future reference.
You start will a full infield & outfield group. The idea behind the drill is to emphasize perfect throws between the players. First off, the drill will consist of 3 rounds. The ball starts in LF. The LF relays to 3B via the SS. 3B throws to 2B (covering 2B) who then relays to 1B, 1B to C, C throws down to 2B. 2B puts the ball in a bucket near 2B. Round 1 is complete. Round 2 is the same as Round 1 except the ball now starts in CF. You throw from CF to 3B via SS, to 2B, to 1B, to C then back to 2B. Drop in bucket. Round 2 complete. Round 3 follows the same procedure except that you are now starting in RF. RF throws to 3B via SS, 3B to 2B, 2B to 1B, 1B to C, C to 2B. Drop in bucket. Round 3 complete. So, the throw pattern can be simplified like this - Round 1: LF - SS - 3B - 2B - 1B - C - 2B (6 throws) Round 2: CF - SS - 3B - 2B - 1B - C - 2B (6 throws) Round 3: RF - SS - 3B - 2B - 1B - C - 2B (6 throws) To spice it up a little, you can mandate that the throws be made under a certain time. If any error is made, a new fielding group must replace the current fielding group. Here's a drill that I love to run with infielders to help our guys perform under pressure and practice making quick exchanges/throws. I learned this drill in college. We called it "Taters" but feel free to come up with whatever name you wish.
The basic idea behind this drill is to make throws around the diamond while a baserunner runs. The infield must complete its actions & throws before the baserunner makes it back to home plate. Setup -
Round 1 -
So, round 2 is identical to round 1, except that coach hits the ball to the SS. Runner takes off on contact. SS throws to 1B, 1B throws to 2B, 2B to SS, SS to 3B, 3B to C (first around the horn complete). Then C to 1B, 1B to 2B, 2B SKIPS SS and throws to 3B, 3B home and, hopefully, beats the runner. So you keep proceeding like this until the defense has been successful with groundballs to all defensive positions (3B, SS, 2B, 1B) - this means you'll have 4 rounds. Now, usually, for youth teams, it is pretty difficult to get them to get through the 1st 4 rounds with no mistakes. So you can usually call it good after they get through 4 rounds. If one team makes it look easy, though, or you have a more advanced group you can proceed with Round 5! In Round 5, you do the same procedure as above EXCEPT that now you're turning double plays. So in round 5, coach hits to 3B (runner takes off for 1B), 3B to 2B to 1B to complete the double play then 1B starts around the horn #1 by throwing to 2B, who throws to SS, who throws to 3B who throws to catcher. Catcher starts the 2nd around the horn by throwing to 1B, who throws to 2B, who throws to SS, who SKIPS 3B and throws directly home and, hopefully, beats the runner. If any error is made, defensive team hustles off the field, new team hustles on and you rotate your baserunners. The new team starts from the very beginning (round 1) If your team gets through all of the double-play rounds, you can then move onto triple-plays. I don't think I've ever seen a team do that. This is a GREAT drill to practice making plays under pressure and causing them to think while under pressure. The baserunner applies natural pressure without the coach having to work a stop watch. The other benefit of that is you get to work on baserunning at the same time. The players have to be able to think/communicate while under pressure because they have to remember to skip the fielder on the 2nd around the horn. It's also a beautiful drill because guys will make mistakes, but the beauty of it is that your team-mates can pick you up. Let's say that the SS makes a bad throw to 1B, the 1B makes a great scoop to pick up and the play continues. That really pumps up them up. Also, it can teach them to stick with the play even if they make a mistake - if they overthrow a guy, chase the ball down and keep trying - maybe the baserunner will trip, you never know. The coach should be reasonable here, though, if the error is really bad and there's no chance they're going to catch up, kill the play and get a new team out there. Keep it moving. Plus the kids are moving almost constantly, so it's a good conditioning drill, too. Recently, I've been thinking more about the mental side of baseball and how to introduce this to my team. A few different influences have shaped my thoughts on this over the past few weeks and my Thanksgiving drive today allowed me to mold those thoughts into an actual plan. So, disclaimer here - I have not tried this plan with a team yet but hope to try it out soon. These are my thoughts about how I could see a basic potential mental training plan panning out. Note also that what I present here focuses mainly on developing a breathing and meditation practice. I also believe in developing proper overall mentality by discussing mindsets (growth vs. fixed) among other things, but I will not adresss those other points here. Primary influences in building this have been Alan Jaegar, who I heard speak at a California coaches clinic, and Jeremy Sheetinger's interview with Nate Trotsky.
First things first - I think the importance of the mental game needs to be explained to and actually practiced with athletes. Many say that baseball is 90% mental but the mental game is either never practiced or, if practiced, is practiced very little. I have always known that the mental side was important, but being able to explain the "why" behind it is just as important to get young athletes to buy into a regular mental game practice routine. One way that can help explain the why involves getting players to think about "the zone" - when they feel that they are in "the zone," what are they actually feeling? Many, I'm sure, would describe an increased sense of focus, a feeling of calm and an ability to concentrate. Once you get them to describe what the zone feeling is, I believe that you can introduce breathing exercises such as square breathing as a way to facilitate those feelings of focus and calm (aka, the "zone" feelings). Square breathing is an exercise during which the breather breathes in for 4 seconds, then holds the breath for 4 seconds, and then breathes out for 4 seconds. Repeat as many times as you wish. You can also vary the timing from 4 seconds to any other length of time that you desire. Check in with your athletes afterwards - how do they feel? Do they feel that engaging in this activity has increased their "zone" feelings? After introducing square breathing, I would leave it at that for Day 1. You've so far introduced them to the concept of being able to adjust their state simply by engaging in a breathing exercise, thus emphasizing the important connection between the breath and both their physical and mental state. To take it to the next level, I believe that you need to introduce them to the concept of meditation. Meditation, in my opinion, should be introduced to athletes in a similar way to how we introduced them to square breathing. We first need to explain the application of meditation while also introducing it as a way to enhance and or strengthen their mental state. I personally believe that meditation is great for developing the ability of one to notice their thoughts and realize that one can have thoughts but choose to not engage them. Simply strive to be an observer of the thoughts passing through your mind - let them pass through like clouds passing across a blue sky. Meditation can help us do this. While developing the ability to notice your thoughts is one application of meditation, another is to remind your players that in order to perform optimally in a game they'll have to be "in the zone" (mentally focused) for up to several hundred pitches. Developing that kind of focus and not taking plays off (as Trotsky has said) will not come easy and will require practice. So, how do we practice meditation? Calm.com offers free guided meditation which can walk you through the basics. Again, the key lesson that I believe the coach needs to relate to his or her players is that you're never going to be able to completely clear your mind. What you do have control over, however, is whether you choose to engage the thoughts in your mind or not. Don't fight the thoughts - just notice them. It's a skill that has to be practiced through meditation. As a sidebar, I think that at some point while explaining these mental concepts to your players, it's important for them to understand that there are 3 main periods of time in which we can exist - the past, the present and the future. While we want to maintain living in the present moment as much as possible, different thoughts cause us to experience various emotions which may detract from our optimal mental state. Thoughts about an error we made (the past) can cause sadness and regret whereas thoughts about the future yet to come may cause anxiety. On the other hand, residing in the present moment can bring feelings of calm and focus (remember these? These are the same feelings we associated with being in the "zone"). So the key point difference between maintaining presence in an optimal state is our thoughts. If we're feeling regret or sadness, we may be engaging thoughts about the past whereas if we're nervous or anxious, we may be engaging thoughts about the future. The key is to learn how to have these thoughts but NOT engage them. Implementing the ideas - To summarize, here are some of the key ideas and practices that I believe will help develop a team's mental ability and improve mental performance.
|
AuthorI love to write about baseball, travel and other life situations. Archives
October 2021
Categories
All
|